Re: to be effcient or not to be efficient

Ronald Bultje wrote:

> On Thu, 2004-01-08 at 13:37, Steve Lhomme wrote:
> 
>>I understand your point. But is ffmpeg able to handle audio ? With low 
>>latency ? Sample accurate (seeking) ? With backward playback ? 
>>Cross-platform ? Speed efficient ? etc
> 
> 
> What you're forgetting is that - no matter what it supports or not - it
> can be extended to support it. It's opensource, remember?

If you quote me, please quote me in the context, which is :

"Actually I think we should throw all our ideas of things we want to be 
able to do at different stages (source, filter, renderer). And see what 
is good in every project.

 From that wishlist we could see what existing projects can match 
(already or with extensions) or cannot."

Of course it means that some may be candidates (to be extended) and some 
not !