Re: Re: An apology about the mass subscription to media-api list - and the reasons why .....

Christian HJ Wiesner wrote:

> This is very interesting ! We have no experience with real time editing 
> at all, so its a pretty good idea to join efforts here, and maybe 
> implement a 'real time layer' into the API, based on their work ? Could 
> you convince anybody from their team to subscribe here also ? Do they 
> have any intentions to extend their project to 'non-real time 
> processing' also ?
> 
> Maybe we can even put this project here on halt and wait for them to 
> make a first draft, to see if it fit our needs ?

As you (Christian) know, I'm working on a DJing software. The goal is to 
support many audio format and have a very low latency. And as I told 
you, the internal API I'm building could be quite easily adapted to a 
wider application (not sure about video yet, but as long as it's 
timestamped it could work). So maybe we could merge all efforts so that 
I can use this new wider "engine" (cross-platform API) and benefit from 
external work too ! The real-time aspect mentioned by Artem could be a 
good point here.