Re: Ogg & Ogg Vorbis _unofficial_ logos page.
"Miguel A. Arévalo" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.multimedia.ogg.advocacy |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Jack Moffitt wrote: > We don't have anyone here good enough to compete at a level where we'd > accept the logos. At least judging from past experience. A properly announced contest (even only in Slashdot) will give you a big audience with a good share of designers. There has been very good ones at the wikepedia's contest. > The fish logo looks fine in black and white. They are already doing > fullcolor stuff on the rest of the box. I'm sorry but as you can see: http://www.mrmoogle.de/gallery/view_photo.php?full=1&set_albumName=iHP-120-Review&id=iriver_ihp120rev_img_19b the whole box is only in shades of gray, they prefer spending money on good earbuds and digital in/out that in flashy boxes. > We see both happening already, and some people using the fish. Most > people use the fish. Which is an error, the fish is the logo of the Xiph.org Foundation. But, then again, neither the fish nor the thor-and-snake tells anything about Ogg nor Vorbis, they are far too eclectic and elaborated. > I suggest coming up with a few different ideas and then presenting them > formally at one of the monthly meetings. Oh! friend, this remembers me the "good old days" of the ITU-T, come on boys, we are in a post-"Cathedral and Bazaar" world, there should be more flexible ways to do simple things... Regards, Miguel A. Arévalo --- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to '[email protected]' containing only the word 'unsubscribe' in the body. No subject is needed. Unsubscribe messages sent to the list will be ignored/filtered.