Re: DRM in OGG - A Proposal

> You can not implement DRM without infringing on consumer rights. 

That depends whose rights you are managing. The problem with DRM is that the 
process has been driven (so far) by neither artists or music lovers. It's the 
creation of the business interests from the pre-digital distribution era.

The killer question is: is a particular DRM system designed to stop people 
from acessing content, or is it designed to collect royalties for artists? 
Every DRM vendor would claim that their system does both, but how many 
musicians have ever received a royalty cheque from a DRM vendor? 

If a DRM system stops people listening to a particular artist, then that 
means the chances of collecting a royalty, or even indirect payments via 
CD's, touring or merchandise are zero. While non-DRM content exists, people 
will choose that instead - and their dollars, euro, and yen will follow.

At the moment, if an artist is heard on the TV or radio - or even at a gig in 
a pay-to-play support slot - we don't assume that every person in the 
audience will buy the CD as a condition of the right to listen. DRM vendors 
hope to extract payment from 100% of listeners - I guess that's why there's 
such an enthusiasm for DRM amongst the big record labels with flat profits.

It can't work if only 50% of music is sold via DRM, especially if the small 
labels without DRM have the best new music. That's why the content industry 
wants hardware-enforced content policing, like Palladium. It'll be because it 
won't be optional, not because software-only DRM is easier to crack.  
Fortunately there's more than one CPU manufacturer in the world and a genuine 
choice in operating systems...

Since the artist can't own any current DRM system, it's just one more method 
of giving control over their work to the content industry - regaining the 
control it lost in the 90's. It's not impossible to conceive of a DRM system 
that limits the rights of the content industry, while safeguarding the rights 
of both artists and listeners. It might need a different acronym though!  

Daniel
--- >8 ----
List archives:  http://www.xiph.org/archives/
To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to '[email protected]'
containing only the word 'unsubscribe' in the body.  No subject is needed.
Unsubscribe messages sent to the list will be ignored/filtered.