Re: I just read your article on OGG & have Question
Daniel James <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.multimedia.ogg.advocacy |
|---|---|
| Organization | mondo designo |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> The only reason for the mention of the > SONY pocket device was to point to the move toward blocking > multiple-copies of audio files. Sure - I think serial copy protection is interesting though, because it gives us an insight into how the industry thinks. Commercial unauthorised duplication, or 'piracy', doesn't require serial copying. The cost of a legit DVD or CD to make large scale illegal copies from, in parallel, is negligible. So I guess that serial copy protection, whether SCMS or CSS, is based on the idea that home copying is the real enemy. I think that's just ignorant; I personally learnt a lot about music from the tapes that my friends made for me when I was at school. None of us had enough money to buy more than a few vinyl albums each, so we all lent vinyl or circulated tapes. In other industries it's called 'word of mouth marketing' and is actually encouraged. Since having my own money to spend I have bought hundreds of CDs, vinyl albums and singles, probably 1000+ by now. > If the industry can somehow manage to find a way to secure > encrypted data in protected music and allow end users to continue > to produce raw files, we should be okay. I think there's a contradiction there - if home studio technology is abundant, and it allows unrestricted manipulation of digital media, then there's a gaping hole in any DRM scheme. I'm not convinced that encryption of music itself is the way forward, given the 'word of mouth marketing' issue - the purpose of making sound recordings is for them to be heard, after all. I would support encryption of metadata though, since we might need to authenticate a particular track, or use this data for automated royalty accounting. There's a whole industry dedicated to the idea that non-tangible 'digital goods' can be treated in just the same way as real products - with greater profits, of course. Personally, I think business models will be forced to change if people challenge this assumption. Cheers! Daniel --- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to '[email protected]' containing only the word 'unsubscribe' in the body. No subject is needed. Unsubscribe messages sent to the list will be ignored/filtered.