Re: persuading mobile phone manufacturers to implement Vorbis support
"Ian Malone" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.multimedia.ogg.advocacy |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 06/05/07, Alexander van Loon <[email protected]> wrote: > So far I don't know about any phone which can play Vorbis. There are a > lot more media players which can play Vorbis, such as those from iriver > and Cowon, yet the more popular media players like those from Creative > and Apple can't. > Actually, if my memory is correct Creative have dabbled in Vorbis. There are also reports that new cheap Chinese players will do it. When I get bored someday I'll check. > If it's possible to play Vorbis with third-party software on Nokia > phones, what's holding Nokia back to implement it themselves so it works > out of the box? AFAIK Vorbis is not patent-encumbered, there are no > license fees, it's 100% free to implement. What could be preventing > manufacturers to implement it? > I can think of two things, how relevant they are is an open question. The first is that implementing it for their device takes developer time that they think is best spent doing other things. To overcome that you have to persuade them the increase in sales will be worth their investment. In fact this is why MailOgging may work better than a letter from Xiph, if lots of people are asking for a feature it tells them there is demand. The second is patent FUD (and this is why the existence of software patents is poisonous), despite Xiph being confident that Vorbis is not encumbered there are people who will expect a patent to be out here. <http://technology.guardian.co.uk/weekly/story/0,,2059851,00.html?gusrc=rss&feed=20> (The above was an article in the Guardian (UK daily), which takes several swipes at Vorbis. There is some discussion of it over at Hydrogren Audio. The argument that Vorbis should be avoided as it might be patented, using MS's recent thrashing over mp3 as an example is pretty flawed. If you can licence a technology and still get sued by a third party then you may as well just use one that has at least some evidence it is patent free.) -- imalone