Re: [Xiph-Advocacy] Artwork resources.

Ian Malone wrote:
> On 07/02/2008, Cory K. <[email protected]> wrote:
>   
>> Cory K. wrote:
>>     
>>> Also, is everyone open to mascot submissions for other Xiph projects
>>> like Ghost?
>>>       
>> I'm still looking for an answer to this one.
>>
>> There was also a question about how the Xiph artwork is licensed. Was a
>> Wikipedia concern I think. Has this been settled?
>>     
>
> WikiMedia.  Wikimedia is being used to host resources for
> SpreadOgg and will not accept files that aren't licensed at
> least share-alike.  Thus under current arrangements
> SpreadOgg resources must have that licensing.

Cool.

> Xiph logos in general are not subject to this rule and you might
> argue it's not desirable since control of the logos is one
> of the few ways Xiph can try to enforce conformance.
>   

Sure. That's completely understandable. I have had to deal with similar
issues in dealing with Ubuntu/Canonical/Ubuntu Studio and want to be
sure I'm in in line with what ever the license is. There doesn't look to
be a clear statement of this anywhere.

-Cory \m/