Re: [Xiph-Advocacy] freedomdefined.org

Sorry, my mistake. I wasn't precise enough.

The resolution set in stone that fair-use images must be replaced
across all Wikimedia projects if a free version is not reasonably
impossible. (Or something like that.)

However, the resolution also mentions an Exemption Doctrine Policy
(EDP) sytem. The English Wikipedia has an EDP, which Matthew has
linked below.

So.... any thoughts on freedomdefined.org, anyone? :)

On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 3:08 PM, Ivo Emanuel Gonçalves
<[email protected]> wrote:
> On 4/16/08, Matthew Flaschen <[email protected]> wrote:
>  > Non-free content is still allowed on English Wikipedia
>  > (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Non-free_content) among
>  > other places.
>
>  I'm only aware of the English Wikipedia, and that's because the US has
>  a fair-use clause on how to handle copyrighted works.  Even then, the
>  EN Wp has been slowly obsoleting any kind of fair-use content in favor
>  of free one.
>
>  -Ivo
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>  Advocacy mailing list
>  [email protected]
>  http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/advocacy
>
_______________________________________________
Advocacy mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/advocacy