Re: [Xiph-Advocacy] freedomdefined.org

Kyungjun Lee wrote:
> Sorry, my mistake. I wasn't precise enough.
> 
> The resolution set in stone that fair-use images must be replaced
> across all Wikimedia projects if a free version is not reasonably
> impossible. (Or something like that.)
> 
> However, the resolution also mentions an Exemption Doctrine Policy
> (EDP) sytem. The English Wikipedia has an EDP, which Matthew has
> linked below.

Right.  Kat is right that we're working to minimize non-free content, 
and we have always insisted on open media.
> 
> So.... any thoughts on freedomdefined.org, anyone? :)

I think it's useful.  It's obviously based on the FSF's definition 
(http://www.fsf.org/licensing/essays/free-sw.html), which I already 
supported.

Matt Flaschen