Re: Averaging preprocessor

Jarno Elonen wrote:

> Of course, it would also be nice to take small motion (camera shaking etc)
> into account while averaging, but I don't know if it could be made accurate
> enough - even though the blocks would be larger than in usual MC.

There are more principled approaches to this ... a popular one is to perform
conservative spatial noise filtering followed by ME and kallman filtering of
pixels along the motion path. This has been done by a lot of people, one example
is http://vision.ai.uiuc.edu/~dugad/research/VideoDenoising/ google for the rest
:)

-h from Doom9.net's forums was going to try to implement such a scheme in an
avisynth filter, dunno if he ever finished it.

Marco

--- >8 ----
List archives:  http://www.xiph.org/archives/
Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/
To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to '[email protected]'
containing only the word 'unsubscribe' in the body.  No subject is needed.
Unsubscribe messages sent to the list will be ignored/filtered.