Re: Averaging preprocessor

> > c) for each block, decide if the contents is still essentially
> >      the same as in last N frames (i.e. nothing has occluded the
> >      picture, picture has not moved and there has not been a cut
> >      in the video)
>
> So it's given that there is no motion at all, right?

Partly right - not motion during the averaging, but I guess that the qual=
ity=20
of the motion vectors that move (portions of) the noise reducted blocks=20
should also be higher since the average presents the real texture better =
than=20
only one previous frame before the movement.

- Jarno
--- >8 ----
List archives:  http://www.xiph.org/archives/
Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/
To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to '[email protected]'
containing only the word 'unsubscribe' in the body.  No subject is needed.
Unsubscribe messages sent to the list will be ignored/filtered.