Re: the basic idea of my codec

Maciek Urbanski wrote:

> pros:
> - together with correct motion estimation, and performed in 3D should beat
> the crap of MPEG, an such ;-)

How exactly would you suggest to integrate motion compensation?

AFAICS good motion compensation would decorrelate the sequence to
the point where 3D coding would not make much sense.

The perceptual metric from that paper you mentioned seems a little
roundabout, since you have greater directional sensitivity in the transform
would something directly in the wavelet domain ala Bradley's Wavelet
Visible Difference Predictor not be more appropriate?

BTW just noticed this on google :
http://www.ktl.elf.stuba.sk/~vargic/papers/zadar2002/zadar2002.pdf

Marco


--- >8 ----
List archives:  http://www.xiph.org/archives/
Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/
To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to '[email protected]'
containing only the word 'unsubscribe' in the body.  No subject is needed.
Unsubscribe messages sent to the list will be ignored/filtered.