Re: Wikipedia article
Remco <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.multimedia.ogg.theora.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 2:20 AM, Jonathan Harker<[email protected]> wrote: > Remco wrote: >> On Sun, Aug 9, 2009 at 6:46 PM, Jonathan Harker<[email protected]> wrote: >>> Please let me know if I've missed out some juicy details, or got >>> anything wrong, or whatever (or feel free to wade in yourselves!) >> >> "As the only mature royalty free video codec (as of July 2009)" >> >> This doesn't seem right to me. Isn't MPEG 1 video also royalty free? > > It's entirely possible; I've left things that I don't know anything > about. Wikipedia has more than it's share of know-it-alls and trolls. I think we can be confident enough that MPEG 1 and Dirac aren't patent-encumbered. The MPEG 1 patent situation is explained in the Wiki article for MPEG 1, and Dirac was made by the BBC and a license for its patents have been granted to the community. However, Dirac isn't exactly mature (or is it?), and MPEG 1 is already showing signs of decomposition. ;) >> In the "Playback Performance" section, it is said that there are no >> mainstream hardware decoders for Theora. I'd like to see a mention of >> a non-mainstream hardware decoder. > > Can you point me at one? That would be a good mention. I didn't know about one, but "no mainstream" implies that there may be a non-mainstream decoder. The Theora site lists some resources on hardware encoding and decoding: <http://wiki.xiph.org/index.php/TheoraHardware> Here is some stuff from Google: <http://www.linuxfordevices.com/c/a/Linux-For-Devices-Articles/Building-an-Ogg-Theora-camera-using-an-FPGA-and-embedded-Linux> <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fPmMYG6_VgI> It's all preliminary, so definitely not mainstream. >> Are there really only two video editors capable of editing Theora? > > There are bits of the article I have left because I don't know whether > its accurate and haven't researched it. > > Of course. Don't view my comments as criticism of you. :) I'm only commenting on the article. It may very well be true that there currently are only two video editors with Theora-support. I was mainly asking this here on the list, so that someone could refute that idea. Remco