Re: Extension to Skeleton for multi-track media
Silvia Pfeiffer <[email protected]> Tue, 27 Apr 2010 10:33:48 +1000
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.multimedia.ogg.theora.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 8:35 AM, Chris Pearce <[email protected]> wrote: > On 23/03/2010 6:43 p.m., Silvia Pfeiffer wrote: >> >> Discussions about a need for an extension to Skeleton to cater for >> multi-track media files has been going on for a while. In a recent >> thread here, in discussions on IRC, and at FOMS between Jan, Ralph, >> Viktor and I, we discussed some fields. Viktor and I continued that >> discussion to make more specific recommendations on what fields to >> add. >> >> We now have a wiki page at http://wiki.xiph.org/SkeletonHeaders that >> has aggregated all the different things that were discussed. >> > > Other than the the message header fields at the wiki page above, is there a > list somewhere of the fields you'd like to see added to the skeleton track? That's the list. > Do you want any of the above fields to be compulsory in the next version of > Skeleton? Compulsory: * Content-type (already is) * Role * Name Optional: * Language * Title * Display-Hint * Altitude (or should we still change this to z-index or maybe Display-Altitude ?) > It looks like all of those headers would be specified in the > fisbone packet, which I don't need to change for indexing. Yes, that's true. > They also look > like they're variable length anyway, so including them as message fields > makes perfect sense. Agreed. > I'm trying to nail down a spec for the indexing-related stuff for a skeleton > 4.0 track, and it would be great if we could produce a unified spec with all > the changes we both want for a skeleton 4.0 track. :) I can just add the fields into the wiki page for skeleton - that won't be difficult. Or did you want a formal spec such as an update of the I-D ? Happy to help with either. Thanks so much for taking control of this! Cheers, Silvia.