Re: Range Coding
Hrishikesh Kulkarni <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.multimedia.ogg.theora.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hello, But can we get an overall gain by using range coding over the coding used in libtheora1.1.1. I tried dumping tokens and coding it with the range coder given by http://www.compressconsult.com/rangecoder The ogv file i get from the theora which has the information, extra bits and coded tokens(by VLC) is smaller than the file i get from coding only tokens with the range coder. Have anyone tried this? Or Anyone who can guide me where i am goin wrong? Regards, hrishi On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 9:55 PM, tterribe <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Timothy Terriberry estimates a simple self-training range-coding >> backend could be reasonably expected to decrease bit usage overhead by >> 15-20%. >> >> Is it really true? I found one implementation.... >> http://svn.xiph.org/trunk/ghost/libentcode/ >> >> Did anyone verified this gain? How much is the exact gain? > > The number quoted there comes from the result of similar experiments > performed during the development of H.264 (they're in the JVT archives > somewhere, but it's been years since I actually looked for this particular > one). I think I originally told Monty "12-20%", but the exact number isn't > really important as it varies from sequence to sequence, and also depends > on how one sets up the context modeling, which is still more of an art than > a science. No one has measured an exact value for Theora, that I know of. > _______________________________________________ > theora mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/theora > On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 3:46 PM, Hrishikesh Kulkarni <[email protected]> wrote: > Dear all, > > I have been going through below mentioned update. > > http://web.mit.edu/xiphmont/Public/theora/demo.html > > I found this line- > Timothy Terriberry estimates a simple self-training range-coding > backend could be reasonably expected to decrease bit usage overhead by > 15-20%. > > Is it really true? I found one implementation.... > http://svn.xiph.org/trunk/ghost/libentcode/ > > Did anyone verified this gain? How much is the exact gain? > > Regards, > hrishi >