My query to MPEG-LA

Basil Mohamed Gohar <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.multimedia.ogg.theora.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
I have sent the following message to MPEG-LA's licensing e-mail address
([email protected]) found here:
http://www.mpegla.com/main/Pages/Contact.aspx
> I would like to inquire about the following case of usage that I think
> is quite common nowadays, and what licensing fees might be applicable
> to such usage.
>
> I purchase a product, such as a Canon digital camera, that has a video
> recording feature which produces H.264-compliant video in an MP4 video
> container format.  Note that said products generally have a clause in
> their manual explaining that usage of H.264 with said device is
> explicitly for personal, non-commercial usage.
>
> I then take this video file and transcode it into another video
> format, say, Ogg Theora or WebM, or something else that does not have
> a licensing fee related to its usage.
>
> I then would like to release said work under a Creative Commons
> Attribute Share-Alike 3.0 US license.  Note that such a license *does*
> allow commercial usages.  You can ignore the specific license, the
> point is, said transcoded work is released under a license that allows
> commercial usage and redistribution in a free/libre manner.
>
> For the purposes of demonstration, let's say the video I recorded and
> then released was exactly 30 minutes long.
>
> The only role H.264 played was in the original capture of the video. 
> It existed only on the camera as well as on my computer after
> copying.  I may keep this file for archival purposes, but I do not
> intend on releasing it for commercial purposes.
>
> Would licensing fees related to the usage of the H.264 spec in the
> above-outlined scenario be applicable?
>
> Additionally, I would request that I can share your response to this
> question of mine on librevideo.org, the contents of which are CC-BY-SA
> 3.0 US (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/us/).  I think
> the answer is something many people have been seeking, and for which
> licensing terms and explanations by others have been very confusing to
> the lay person who is the actual target user of said products.
>
> Thank you in advance for your explanation.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Basil Mohamed Gohar, /Libre Video/ (http://librevideo.org)
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.