Re: NHW Project - high compression (-l6 setting and below)
Raphael Canut <[email protected]> Fri, 30 Mar 2018 21:07:38 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.multimedia.ogg.theora.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAKE58qEm5Zfbuv8vM2m+Qa6nrU8Q0p2wJjKdQYb+WcOS=h6sSA@mail.gmail.com> |
Hello Spork, > If you want though, when I find some time, I can work on supporting a better command line parsing. Yes that would be great as my command line parsing is not good at all. > Does your codec compile under Linux? If not, that's something I can try to work on as well. I never tested my codec under Linux )-:, and so it would be also great to compile it under Linux.I think that if there are changes to do, it would be minor ones... I don't have a makefile..., it simply compiles with: gcc *.c -O3 -o nhw_encoder.exe. > But right now, we have been so busy, it's insane. Trying to setup a small business Absolutely no problem, really focus on your priorities, and best of luck with your project! Cheers, Raphael 2018-03-28 22:58 GMT+02:00 Spork Schivago <[email protected]>: > Raphael, > > Personally, I feel one of the highest priorities to get help right now > should be trying to support images of different sizes. With the current > restrictions of 512 x 512, why would someone, let's say, on the MCU forums, > contribute, or want to use the codec, if they physically cannot use it on > their device because their device needs larger pictures, for example. > > I know you have more pressing needs, but it'd be nice if you, or someone > else with codec experience (that person is NOT me!!!!!) could help > implement that and submit a pull request to update the code to support > images of any size. > > With the current code, you might find that the compression only works with > pictures of 512 x 512, and using an image a lot larger could cause many > issues. Or perhaps, supporting larger / smaller images would require > drastic changes in code, and you might have to rewrite a lot. > > That's just my two cents. > > If you want though, when I find some time, I can work on supporting a > better command line parsing. Does your codec compile under Linux? If > not, that's something I can try to work on as well. But right now, we > have been so busy, it's insane. Trying to setup a small business > legitimate and the Windows licensing is very confusing. Even Microsoft > employees don't fully understand it! We just want to run Windows in a > couple of VMs on a Linux box, along with running Windows on a workstation. > Turns out we need to purchase Enterprise Edition with Software Assurance > and maybe VDI licenses for every device that's going to connect. My > wife's laptop, running Windows 10 Home legally cannot connect remotely, > because it has to be Pro or higher. Not sure about the Linux machines. > They said a reseller would contact us (which they said before, but for > some reason, it was never entered into the system). > > But I guess that last paragraph has nothing to do with your codec really > (except the command line parsing and Linux support). Just needed to vent > a little! > > Sorry! > > Spork Schivago > > On 28 March 2018 at 16:18, Raphael Canut <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> I would like to thank very much the Theora channel community for their >> support and help!!! And even recently a Theora channel member proposed me >> to freely host on his server the NHW Project website, to present the codec >> on the embedded processors, MCU forums that he knows well, another member >> forked my GitHub repository!!! Really thank you very much!!! >> >> It makes me think that maybe the NHW Project will not disappear as many >> great projects before like Rududu codec, DLI compression, UCI codec (x264 >> intra) and others... -but these projects will maybe resurrect today-. >> >> There are some delay with the -l6 and lower quality settings because it >> is difficult to create good ones, that can compete with HEVC.But it would >> be so great to have some help from the community! Because I think that the >> NHW Project is not dead, and I start to be more optimistic with the recent >> improvements, because from -h3 to -l5 quality settings, it is very >> competitive, I find it on par or better than x265 (HEVC)! And it is >> furthermore royalty-free and x50 faster to encode and x15 faster to decode >> than x265! With these advantages, better, very faster, free compared to >> HEVC, it can maybe find a place in mobile devices, embedded devices... >> >> So who knows, the NHW Project has maybe a future, it remains -l6 and >> others high compression settings, it is not easy, not to say extremely hard >> (for me) and it would be so great to have some help from the community, for >> those who have some skills in codec development!!! Monty, would you know >> developers that could be interested in giving little time to the NHW >> Project? >> >> Well, many thanks again to the community! and do not hesitate to test the >> last version of the NHW Project that is very competitive! >> >> Cheers, >> Raphael >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> theora mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/theora >> >> > _______________________________________________ theora mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/theora