Re: NHW Project - some update
Raphael Canut <[email protected]> Mon, 9 Jul 2018 23:56:41 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.multimedia.ogg.theora.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAKE58qGdFcVe+xOrR7USU6KkvuLE+T5CqggxAL1kfj1G0ykKww@mail.gmail.com> |
Hello Dave! Thank you very much for your answer! You're right.I have thought that the new next-generation codecs like JVET (MPEG) VVC, AOM AV1, XVC will be too computational-intensive for mobile phones.So the de facto codecs for mobiles devices are H.264 and HEVC, I thought that my codec that is royalty-free and a lot faster could move the lines, but you're right Apple is "attached" to MPEG and Google and the others are "attached" to AOM. > Look to Asia I am always very attracted by new opportunities for my NHW Project! But don't you think there will be a problem of compatibility? For example a company wants to use the NHW Project in its new mobile phone, but what will happen if the NHW Project is not supported by web browsers? Anyway, I am very interested to look to Asia, would you have some advice? Cheers, Raphael 2018-07-09 23:33 GMT+02:00 Dave Johnson Games <[email protected]>: > I think Apple is somehow "attached" to the MPEG group. They control the > "pools" too. Your codec sounds great. Google could -- if they wanted to -- > use it but they have Web^M and webP. Look to Asia. Asus has just launched a > new phone. ?? > > On Mon, Jul 9, 2018, 3:14 PM Raphael Canut <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> I don't have advanced on the NHW Project this past month, but I have >> definitely validated its characteristics and this new version. >> >> The NHW Codec preserves or enhances image neatness and sharpness, which >> translates that on good quality images the NHW Codec is globally better >> than HEVC, and on degraded (with blur, artifacts) images it is worse than >> HEVC because it lacks of precision. I have made tests on 100 images from >> the Internet. >> >> The NHW Project still lacks very high compression, and I think now I will >> inspire from HEVC, that is to say, I would like to strongly remove details >> and preserve the contours, edges. It is not that easy to code, and again >> any help would be very very welcome! Again if you can provide any help to >> the NHW Project, do not hesitate to show up, would be so much appreciated!!! >> >> The NHW codec has a high speed, which makes it a good candidate for >> mobile, embedded devices.There are currently some exploration for a >> MotionJPEG replacement on low power processor (dual-core 240MHz Xtensa LX6) >> where MotionJPEG appears to be too heavyweight. >> >> With the recent updates, I think the NHW Project is still patent-free and >> royalty-free. And just the fact that it is royalty-free, should be worth >> the try. >> >> So with this new version, I hope the NHW Project could attract a company >> that would like to sponsorize the project (to adapt the codec to any size >> of image for example). >> >> Very quickly to finish, I have seen that on the Theora mailing list there >> are employees from big companies.This can be indiscreet and very impolite, >> but for example there are 2 employees from Apple who are on the Theora >> channel mailing list... Does Apple can be interested in such a codec as the >> NHW Project? If not, what does it lack to be of interest? Would you have >> some advice? >> >> Many thanks again! >> Cheers, >> Raphael >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> theora mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/theora >> > _______________________________________________ theora mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/theora