new -l16 "extreme" compression quality setting
Raphael Canut <[email protected]> Sun, 27 Jan 2019 20:53:25 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.multimedia.ogg.theora.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAKE58qF45EvP8k806_fdA2aJL3ewQCSo-Opg220vDDa33hMHsA@mail.gmail.com> |
--===============4474731593544788131== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000007bd87d058075eae2" --0000000000007bd87d058075eae2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Hello, I have added a new -l16 "extreme" compression quality setting to the NHW Project. This new -l16 quality setting is surprisingly good actually, because I find it better on some images than -l15 quality setting whereas files size is smaller.I notably find this new -l16 quality setting better than x265 (HEVC). More at: http://nhwcodec.blogspot.com/ We can still save 2.5KB per .nhw compressed file. I however know that this work is hopeless because the industry will soon standardize AOM AV1 (AVIF) as the new image compression codec.I have also read on twitter that the new JPEG XL standard will be based on AOM AV1.I could not test AOM AV1 but I guess that if the Alliance for Open Media never answered me it's because AOM AV1 is better than the NHW Project. Anyway I wanted to remind the advantages of the NHW Project, it is visually better than x265 (HEVC), it is royalty-free, and it is a lot faster to encode/decode than x264, x265, AOM AV1,... If you think there is a niche where the NHW Project would shine, please do not hesitate to let me know. Many thanks! Cheers, Raphael --0000000000007bd87d058075eae2 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" <div dir="ltr"> <div id="gmail-:17k" class="gmail-a3s gmail-aXjCH"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div>Hello,</div><div><br></div><div>I have added a new -l16 "extreme" compression quality setting to the NHW Project.</div><div><br></div><div>This new -l16 quality setting is surprisingly good actually, because I find it better on some images than -l15 quality setting whereas files size is smaller.I notably find this new -l16 quality setting better than x265 (HEVC).</div><div><br></div><div>More at: <a href="http://nhwcodec.blogspot.com/" target="_blank">http://nhwcodec.blogspot.com/</a></div><div><br></div><div>We can still save 2.5KB per .nhw compressed file.</div><div><br></div><div>I however know that this work is hopeless because the industry will soon standardize AOM AV1 (AVIF) as the new image compression codec.I have also read on twitter that the new JPEG XL standard will be based on AOM AV1.I could not test AOM AV1 but I guess that if the Alliance for Open Media never answered me it's because AOM AV1 is better than the NHW Project.</div><div><br></div><div>Anyway I wanted to remind the advantages of the NHW Project, it is visually better than x265 (HEVC), it is royalty-free, and it is a lot faster to encode/decode than x264, x265, AOM AV1,... If you think there is a niche where the NHW Project would shine, please do not hesitate to let me know.</div><div><br></div><div>Many thanks!</div><div>Cheers,</div><div>Raphael</div></div></div></div> </div> --0000000000007bd87d058075eae2-- --===============4474731593544788131== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: inline X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18KdGhlb3JhIG1h aWxpbmcgbGlzdAp0aGVvcmFAeGlwaC5vcmcKaHR0cDovL2xpc3RzLnhpcGgub3JnL21haWxtYW4v bGlzdGluZm8vdGhlb3JhCg== --===============4474731593544788131==--