NHW new release - bug fix

--===============6108578546376200328==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000e6e24705b20d6dd2"

--000000000000e6e24705b20d6dd2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

Hello,

Just a quick message, I have fixed a bug in the last version of NHW because
there could be a segmentation fault for some images.Sorry for the error.

Correction and update on my demo page: http://nhwcodec.blogspot.com/

Else very quickly I find that this last version has now a good balance
between neatness and precision, and I find this visually pleasant, and more
and more interesting, I am currently comparing with AVIF.I'll try to
improve this again, but for example I have a processing that improves again
precision but now it starts to decrease neatness, and so I find results
less interesting... Neatness is still the main advantage of NHW I want to
preserve.

Also I am (visually) comparing with avifenc with -s 0 setting: slowest
speed/best quality, but ultra-optimized (multi-threading, SIMD,...) AVIF -s
0 then takes in average 15s to encode an image on my computer, whereas
totally unoptimized NHW takes 30ms to encode that same image!... So
extremely fast speed is also an advantage of NHW!

Cheers,
Raphael

--000000000000e6e24705b20d6dd2
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"

<div dir="ltr"><div>Hello,</div><div><br></div>
Just a quick message, I have fixed a bug in the last version of NHW 
because there could be a segmentation fault for some images.Sorry for 
the error.<br>
<br>
Correction and update on my demo page: <a href="http://nhwcodec.blogspot.com/" target="_blank">http://nhwcodec.blogspot.com/</a><br>
<br>
Else very quickly I find that this last version has now a good balance 
between neatness and precision, and I find this visually pleasant, and 
more and more interesting, I am currently comparing with AVIF.I&#39;ll try 
to improve this again, but for example I have a processing that improves
 again precision but now it starts to decrease neatness, and so I find 
results less interesting... Neatness is still the main advantage of NHW I
 want to preserve.<br>
<br>
Also I am (visually) comparing with avifenc with -s 0 setting: slowest 
speed/best quality, but ultra-optimized (multi-threading, SIMD,...) AVIF
 -s 0 then takes in average 15s to encode an image on my computer, 
whereas totally unoptimized NHW takes 30ms to encode that same image!...
 So extremely fast speed is also an advantage of NHW!<br>
<br>
Cheers,<br>
Raphael
		

</div>

--000000000000e6e24705b20d6dd2--

--===============6108578546376200328==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Disposition: inline

X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18KdGhlb3JhIG1h
aWxpbmcgbGlzdAp0aGVvcmFAeGlwaC5vcmcKaHR0cDovL2xpc3RzLnhpcGgub3JnL21haWxtYW4v
bGlzdGluZm8vdGhlb3JhCg==

--===============6108578546376200328==--