Re: [rfc] Order of projects in download section

R.L. Horn wrote:

> Personally, I think I'd rather see them listed in installation order. 
> I.e. libogg, libvorbis, libflac, libspeex, libao, vorbis-tools, 
> vorbis-java, libtheora, and libxspf (or somesuch).  I can't see that the 
> list is long enough to require alphabetization, though that would at least 
> place the libraries ahead of the tools.

That actually make sense, especially if you explicitly state
that say:

    libvorbis (depends on libogg)
    libspeex (depends on libogg)
    vorbis-tools (depends on libvorbis)

and so on.

Erik
-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Erik de Castro Lopo
-----------------------------------------------------------------
"O'Caml ... a "language designed for smart people" if there
ever was one." -- Mike Vanier