Re: any optimizations possible in OGG or vorbis to reduce time?

Sumit Chatterjee <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.multimedia.ogg.vorbis.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
I dont understand exactly the terms that you have asked. Basically if I have
a continuous stream to be sent out - a computational delay of 50-100ms is
still manageable.

Regarding my platform:
   - its on Windows and my encode is running under realtime priority.
   - my audio capture is every 500ms.
   - And my OGG container is reduced to 2KB. So a min of 6KB data is flushed
out after every ~600ms from the encoder

I basically want to reduce the encoding time to generate a packet of 6KB
from 200-300 ms to <100ms always, so that I can support least setup latency
in my radio application.

Thanks
Sumit


2009/9/3 Gregory Maxwell <[email protected]>

> On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 2:26 PM, Sumit Chatterjee<[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > Respected all,
> >     I have been able to make my whole setup ready with OGG VORBIS encoder
> > and decoder as provided by the open source libraries. I am very happy
> with
> > the result. I have one concern in the same. : Can the performance of the
> > encoder be enhanced? Currently for 44KHz stream it is taking upto 300ms
> to
> > encode 500-600ms of data. I wanted a figure well within 500 ms.
> >     Can I get a starting point that I can attack either in OGG library or
> in
> > VORBIS encoder library...??
>
>
> Greetings. Is your concern algorithmic delay or computational
> complexity?  If the latter— what platform are you testing on?  The
> encoder is a decent multiple of realtime on typical desktop processors
> today.
>

_______________________________________________
Vorbis-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/vorbis-dev
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.