Re: Enhanced Podcasts with Ogg Vorbis (Chapter Marks)

I guess since we can have VorbisComment headers in all logical
bitstreams (i.e. all tracks), we should be fine with having chapters
in there.
It would also make sense to introduce a separate header page for chapters.
Both of these solutions have the drawback that we may end up with
chapters in multiple bitstreams, so the question would be which one to
use.
Instead, it could just go into skeleton...

The simplest solution certainly is to not have to worry about any new
multiplexing requirements and do what you say. It's probably
sufficient for now.

Silvia.



On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 11:04 AM,  <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 6:43 PM, Silvia Pfeiffer
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Monty,
>>
>> How were you thinking of implementing support for chapters in Ogg?
>> Introduce them into VorbisComment? Or into Skeleton? Or encapsulate
>> them into a Kate track of sorts? How did OGM do it?
>
> People here were specifically addressing podcasts (audio) and the
> suggestion had been in Vorbis comments.
>
> I'm not sure how OGM did it.
>
> As far as Vorbis is concerned, I'm happy enough at this point to bless
> it as a limited but immediately useful spec.
>
> It's probably worth more thought w.r.t transOgg, where I'd like to
> take control of the global metadata task where Ogg mostly just waved
> hands.
>
> Monty