Re: Source

Martin Stevens <[email protected]> Mon, 6 May 2002 18:19:50 +0100
Newsgroups gmane.comp.multimedia.opencd.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Sun, May 05, 2002 at 08:55:21PM -0300, Steve Mallett wrote:
> > I think the best plan is this.
> >
> >  * On the CD, mention that the source is available from our website.
> >    Explain what the source is, why people might want it and why they
> >    might not.
> >
> >  * From our website, link to the source tarballs on the projects'
> >    websites -- we don't host the source ourselves.
> 
> We aren't seriously going to try to swamp the author's server/website/wallet 
> are we?  If this project proves worth doing we will get help somewhere.   I 
> would call that "bad form".  My $.02

I think that the fact that we are creating a CD with the software on it
would save the authors bandwidth,

i.e.

I download the software then say distrobute 10 cd's that means only 
one download from the authors site instead of 10. 

Sounds like a good deal to me.

And users that want the source will invaribly end up testing/debugging
stuff for the developers so everyone wins.

Or is that in my perfect world.

Just my 0.2 groats

> 
- 
Budgester Technologies Ltd
Office : 01992 718568
Mobile : 07815 982380
mailto:[email protected]
http://www.budgester.com

_______________________________________________________________

Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download mirrors. We supply
the hardware. You get the recognition. Email Us: [email protected]