Re: Source
Martin Stevens <[email protected]> Mon, 6 May 2002 18:19:50 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.multimedia.opencd.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sun, May 05, 2002 at 08:55:21PM -0300, Steve Mallett wrote: > > I think the best plan is this. > > > > * On the CD, mention that the source is available from our website. > > Explain what the source is, why people might want it and why they > > might not. > > > > * From our website, link to the source tarballs on the projects' > > websites -- we don't host the source ourselves. > > We aren't seriously going to try to swamp the author's server/website/wallet > are we? If this project proves worth doing we will get help somewhere. I > would call that "bad form". My $.02 I think that the fact that we are creating a CD with the software on it would save the authors bandwidth, i.e. I download the software then say distrobute 10 cd's that means only one download from the authors site instead of 10. Sounds like a good deal to me. And users that want the source will invaribly end up testing/debugging stuff for the developers so everyone wins. Or is that in my perfect world. Just my 0.2 groats > - Budgester Technologies Ltd Office : 01992 718568 Mobile : 07815 982380 mailto:[email protected] http://www.budgester.com _______________________________________________________________ Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download mirrors. We supply the hardware. You get the recognition. Email Us: [email protected]