Re: introducing deken trends

Alexandre Torres Porres <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.multimedia.puredata.general
Message-ID <CAEAsFmjuAgJKK-NhFmzY4V98rviJxVAKF7foakOv9bc-QeiriA@mail.gmail.com>
Em qua., 27 de ago. de 2025 às 07:17, IOhannes m zmoelnig via Pd-list <
[email protected]> escreveu:

> i don't think i will ever try to publish JOINed queries (as in: "how
> many people in *china* download *else*" or "how many users of *macOS*
> use *Pd-0.50*" or "who is this guy from *brazil* who keeps asking for
> *Gem* to run with *Pd-0.41* on their *macOS/Sequioa*").
>

Hmmm, I get it, everything we get to see is published by you, so you have
to work on it and I get how all combinations would be crazy. But I thought
and I could suggest people could be able to do some research. There was a
suggestion to allow members to do that, and that seems reasonable.


> letme rephrase my concern: if you see that your external hasn't had any
> downloads for the last 24 months, would you stop publishing it (since
> nobody cares anyhow)?
>

I for one wouldn't. I'm cursed and doomed to develop pd externals 'til the
day I die, or something weird/terrible happens.


> i somewhat understand the eagerness to see the performance of your own
> "product". i often look for that information for my own packages (e.g.
> on pypi). but to be honest, it is mostly to satisfy my own ego.
> and the practical implications are nil.
>

I just think this could be a good tool for analyzing the ecosystem beyond
what you are offering. I wrote a paper essay these days (and it got
rejected for the PdMaxCon, as they didn't seem to be keen on essays) that
talked a lot about the history of Pd and stuff. This would have been an
amazing tool for research and analysis to help me with that research. I
still wanna work on it and publish it as an essay somewhere.

I'm kind of in a rush with the PdMaxCon trip coming up next week and I
don't have much time to sit and make a strong case right now, so I'll just
give a quick opinion. I think there are more benefits than
'risks/hazard/damage' in being able for us developers to be able to analyze
this data in more detail. Even if it comes down to being "ego driven cool".

I had to look what "pypi" is...  as I see it, it's an example of another
ecosystem that doesn't have a problem in making download and usage
statistics available, which is kind of my point. I don't think the idea
there is only to attend to people's egos, but make researchers and
developers understand and analyze the trends.
I don't wanna dismiss the concerns, and maybe I'm just not really getting
them. Or maybe it's all a matter of opinion and this is mine.

cheers

---
[email protected] - the Pure Data mailinglist
https://lists.iem.at/hyperkitty/list/[email protected]/message/GFN2NPVUYFKXUCAJRO3OMPRZZW7SHJW2/

To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.iem.at/
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.