Re: Abstraction with optional dynamic number of iolets without dependencies and stray prints
Alexandre Torres Porres <[email protected]> Wed, 31 Dec 2025 14:02:22 -0300
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.multimedia.puredata.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAEAsFmis7UP0-ayChFTm6rNJvLMZCNveLfzYdRV-F1OCz8FBcw@mail.gmail.com> |
Em qua., 31 de dez. de 2025 às 11:40, Giulio Moro via Pd-list < [email protected]> escreveu: > or - perhaps more simply - to have some vanilla way of sending an initbang? > I agree this is something that should belong to Vanilla. I had a PR for adding both [closebang] and [initbang] that had conflicts, see https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/pull/616 I made a new one for [closebang] and will find my time now to add yet another just for initbang (I don't remember having a reason not to do that, i guess I was lazy?). Now, as far as a hack goes, I believe one can try and make [savestate] behave like initbang, but I wouldn't know how they would differ and about any caveats (and I fear there might be ones). This is not something officially documented or supported. Cheers and happy new year to all here in this beloved Pd community --- [email protected] - the Pure Data mailinglist https://lists.iem.at/hyperkitty/list/[email protected]/message/XT6I23KSDL2B2RN5GOOXI7HXCPKYWDUS/ To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.iem.at/