Re: Possible bug with text search range
"Ben Wesch" <[email protected]> Thu, 19 Mar 2026 12:55:20 -0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.multimedia.puredata.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
cyrille henry wrote: > It look like the text search ignore the range in some situation. there was some confusion about the second argument in the `range` message, which sets the range size, not the right index (see (see https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/issues/2868 ). so the message syntax is `range <onset> <range>`, not `range <from> <to>`: https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/blob/208fd75ec24d381dddada34224dc40ee1ed73238/src/x_text.c#L1329-L1332 this was not well explained in the [text search] help for older pd version and https://github.com/ben-wes/pure-data/commit/588b125c568715404a3d97b37597d6be8da56d0a tried to clarify things a bit - but it might still not match intuitive expectations. cheers, ben --- [email protected] - the Pure Data mailinglist https://lists.iem.at/hyperkitty/list/[email protected]/message/56MBIVGA7H2ZXKIT3ZSWE3WWE6F2KZGV/ To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.iem.at/