libxmms license is not LGPL?
Ben Winslow <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.multimedia.xmms.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I noticed that libxmms's license isn't LGPL... Is this intentional, or just an oversight? -- Ben Winslow <[email protected]>
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 900 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Fingerprint: 17F8 0D02 A7DA 7C7F A661 183D 6E2A 04FD 410A 2DCF iQIUAwUAPzPr1W4qBP1BCi3PAQKv6g/2IpP4lFvgLH7vPDr6hg95Ct9lq0Y7VFF4 HOYV1G3Ae1jITyEgQZ3QR8VrGiDZazVyw2axZys/hXQgWsHB9mEjspsANy7QKVwt u8ZBRrh9B9KRryYDdWMMI+fFuV3APduwZ+ThvRsHkWkwydnAY/K4wCwlqdFR90pN a+yy2TpxByUUduAl6AykIo7y08nFNWw91xxHWvIRygq8qkIoqqjPfvPPeyKFKOCK NQF2SiamqY/mVjE2GijWxVY5gsgFGQtWWUayImTyJQaxkczs6V0VstMsyici1bMd ih8lwbhNFFFpt5WOxvDUtOabuJsaxQfopj4frzKBpQuPc9kZGSEvf2UhzGek7Hoe iH/xG7VkANgEGOOyHXzGfWKuT+KecLbO7au/54gHTXgzPjJkkFTxuq9ggXB4VJBh zN3Et5F7SBKwoOIlPFbGNNLQsbE6VIKK6SXBtxbfdWvgKYc0uyb7DSFbrN0gOkUg RdL0e9WyklJoZ9OUQvhNT0vhJ1uXBxY0h8f1qDYKgRNXgyRaoJ8yCUcaCE8Fyv77 jprYVxn90N892MSF6kDl3u483vLxdMC1h+vh5twFD97N9B9Zhc4288T06AZQ6BTM 2RZrftcYGmt+XLuS/l93ngpnmPbbwYuAPUR0ySDiMZbikROGGqOeb6Tbz1Xdi2ZX q83eQvmnTg== =jUK5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----