RE: [NeoStats-Devel] FloodServ

"M" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.neostats.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Justin Hammond wrote:
> Some of the improvements that I had thought about was 
> extending it beyond the channel layer and move it to the IRCd layer.
> Eg:
> Add support for monitoring a large number of connects from 
> Class C networks (Hybrid TCM does this, but its usefullness 
> from the perspective of zombied machines might be limited now)
> 
> Add monitoring for the average number of connects on each 
> IRCd (eg, if my daily average connects is 1 connect every 10 
> seconds, and it all of a sudden jumped to 10 connects, we 
> might have a inbound flood.) There might not be much you can 
> do, but at least give the opers some warning...
> 
> Monitoring the channel joins/parts of users. Typically some 
> of the spam bots or stats bots that are out there will cycle 
> each public channel very quickly... 

This could be useful. If we take the webcamspam as an example, it joins
channels in order of the raw output of /list so a /join chan1, /part chan1,
/join chan2 etc would be sufficient to detect such bots. However, this would
mean we would have to maintain a raw list of channels via a client list
command unless we can determine an algorithm to identify the first few
channels that would be output via raw. I assume it could be determined from
TS but have not looked into it.

Mark.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.