RE: [NeoStats-Devel] 3.0 warning frenzy
"M" <[email protected]> Sat, 20 Aug 2005 21:38:08 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.neostats.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
OK will do. With nefarious.c the warning is simply that one of the modes added is outside of the 32 but range. In reality this should have no impact since it means that NeoStats will see only the truncated form (as unsigned should be 0x00000000) which will never map to anything so NeoStats will just ignore that mode in the same way the mode override system works. It is not addressed so it is a reminder to me to fix it properly at some point or for Reed to select a mode we could temporarily ignore until we can handle more than 32 modes. Since it is a channel mode, it has little effect on any potential use of modes within NeoStats. Mark. > -----Original Message----- > From: Justin Hammond [mailto:justin-kLev/[email protected]] > Sent: 20 August 2005 15:11 > To: [email protected] > Subject: RE: [NeoStats-Devel] 3.0 warning frenzy > > Hi Mark, > > If you don't have access to GCC 3.4 let me know when your > finished, and I'll run it though that as well. 3.4 generates > a lot of additional warnings that might be worthwhile to look > into (or not). > > Also, Did you ever see the warning in nefarious.c? > > I tried tracking it down, but a bit of Macro magic got me lost: > > Compiling nefarious.c: > [OK] > > nefarious.c:329: warning: integer constant is too large for > "long" type > nefarious.c:329: warning: large integer implicitly > truncated to unsigned type > > I thought this might have a bit of a significant impact, > because if I was on the right track, its to do with usermodes. > > Thanks > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: M [mailto:[email protected]] > > Sent: Saturday, August 20, 2005 7:39 AM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: [NeoStats-Devel] 3.0 warning frenzy > > > > > > Depending on your compiler 3.0 may generate a lot of > warnings of the > > nature of "incompatible pointer type". > > > > Please do not email me or the list to complain about these, > I do know > > about them. They are due to a work in progress throughout > the source > > and will be fixed pretty soon. They have no effect on run time > > operation of NeoStats or modules. > > > > Mark. > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: devel-unsubscribe-wool9L35kifE9wlyV4mCnKxOck334EZe@public.gmane.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: devel-unsubscribe-wool9L35kifE9wlyV4mCnKxOck334EZe@public.gmane.org > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >