RE: [NeoStats-Devel] [Commits] r363 - branches/3.0
"Justin Hammond" <justin-kLev/[email protected]> Mon, 29 Aug 2005 23:04:46 +0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.neostats.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I would actually keep it in original form on the user struct, and let the user decide if they want to strip it. No use stripping the version reply if we don't have SecureServ loaded etc, just a waste of CPU cycles IMHO. Thanks > -----Original Message----- > From: M [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Saturday, August 13, 2005 6:43 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: RE: [NeoStats-Devel] [Commits] r363 - branches/3.0 > > > > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] > > Author: Fish > > Modified: branches/3.0/scan.c > > int ScanCTCPVersion(Client *u, char* buf) { > > + strip_mirc_codes(buf); > > return Scan(DET_CTCP, u, buf); > > } > > Is there ever likely a need for us to use an original > unstripped form? If > not, maybe we should strip core side. I am also considering > storing the CTCP > responses such as this in the User struct so we could > potentially store both > but I am not sure if there is any worth in the original form. > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: devel-unsubscribe-wool9L35kifE9wlyV4mCnKxOck334EZe@public.gmane.org > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >