thoughts on engine choice
Andrew Jensen <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.openoffice.dba.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I would like to expand on something I allueded to in an earlier message. The choice of HSQLDB for inorporation into OOoBase. The issue of HSQLDB requiring Java for the creation of stored procedures, is likely a straw man. Yes, it is on the surface a bit more daunting to some then a native scripting languge, such as PL/SQL. But the truth is that for the causual user PL/SQL is a huge hurdle in an dof iself. So the isssue is possibly mute. On another front however it seems like an excellent choice. There should be a very natural upgrade path for a company if they choose OOBase. In the embedded form it would allow quick development of a stand alone, single user application. The file based and server models of the engine should, on the face of it, offer a natural path to move to larger number of concurrent users without signigicant changes to the application. Another way to view this would be if a small company used the server model first, to support in house users. While creating a single user version of the application for use on outside staff laptops. I hope that these type of implementations are in the vision of what OOoBase is to become. Andrew Jensen