thoughts on engine choice

Andrew Jensen <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.openoffice.dba.user
Message-ID <[email protected]>
I would like to expand on something I allueded to in an earlier message. 
The choice of HSQLDB for inorporation into OOoBase.

The issue of HSQLDB requiring Java for the creation of stored 
procedures, is likely a straw man. Yes, it is on the surface a bit more 
daunting to some then a native scripting languge, such as PL/SQL. But 
the truth is that for the causual user PL/SQL is a huge hurdle in an dof 
iself. So the isssue is possibly mute.

On another front however it seems like an excellent choice. There should 
be a very natural upgrade path for a company if they choose OOBase. In 
the embedded form it would allow quick development of a stand alone, 
single user application. The file based and server models of the engine 
should, on the face of it, offer a natural path to move to larger number 
of concurrent users without signigicant changes to the application. 
Another way to view this would be if a small company used the server 
model first, to support in house users. While creating a single user 
version of the application for use on outside staff laptops.

I hope that these type of implementations are in the vision of what 
OOoBase is to become.

Andrew Jensen
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.