Re: Some consistency in IDL please

Hi,

i have cleaned up the IDLs on the dev300 codeline.

The @since tags were indeed used different all over in our IDL files. I
have unified the usage based on the following:

- use @since OOo <major>.<minor>[.<micro>]
<micro> is used only if > 0

Examples:
@since OOo 2.0
@since OOo 2.3
@since OOo 2.3.1
@since OOo 3.0
@since OOo 3.3

Things like
- @since OOo 2.0.0 got replaced with @since OOo 2.0
- @since OOo 2.3.0 got replaced with @since OOo 2.3
- @since OpenOffice.org 2.0.0 got replaced with @since OOo 2.0

Please take care of this in the future and use the new defined rule

@since OOo <major>.<minor>[.<micro>], <micro> only if > 0

Juergen


On 10/29/10 1:44 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> On 10/29/10 1:21 PM, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
>> On 10/29/10 12:17, Bernard Marcelly wrote:
>>> For the latest version 3.3.0 I found these variants, on various IDLs:
>>>
>>> @since OpenOffice.org 3.3
>>> @since OOo 3.3
>>> @since OOo 3.3.0
>>> @since OOo3.3
>>> @since OpenOffice.org 3.3
>>>
>>> Please, API developers, could you stick to one rule ? :-)
>>
>> <http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/UNO_@since_Tags> documents
>> which rule to stick to.
> thanks for the pointer.
> 
> We have both versions for minors, e.g. 3.1 and 3.1.0. I think we should
> unify it to the short version 3.1. It's simply nicer and shorter. But we
> should always provide major and minor because 3.0 looks better than 3.
> 
> I will cleanup the IDLs
> 
> Juergen
> 
>>
>> -Stephan
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>>
>