LO removing Java, why would they want to? (Re: [api-dev] Java-Midi not working on Mac?

On 22.12.2010 19:13, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> On 12/22/10 6:03 PM, Martin Dobiasch wrote:
>   
... cut ...
>> Its installed as I've tested some other code on that Mac using the
>> Midi API
>> of Sun-Java. For example the same extension works for NeoOffice.
>> Do you know where in the code I can find the java implementation? Maybe I
>> can dig into it and compare Libre/Open-Office with NeoOffice
>>     
> The UI of NeoOffice is completely Java based i assume they run native 64
> bit. Anyway you can't simply compare NeoOffice with OpenOffice.org here.
>
> Don't expect a fix form LibO they work more in the direction to remove
> Java completely ;-)
>   
Why would they want to cripple OOo that badly ?

Do you happen to know the rationale by any chance?
Maybe the question rephrased to make it more on-track: would there be a
problem with Java in OOo, such that removing Java would solve a problem?
And if so, what would it be?

---rony