Re: LO removing Java, why would they want to? (Re: [api-dev] Java-Midi not working on Mac?

> That's the point: not all of OOo is written in C++ anymore, there are
> quite important subsystems written in Java.
>
> One premiere example is the scripting subsystem, which makes JavaScript,
> BeanShell, ooRexx and others available to OOo. Removing Java removes all
> these options and renders programs written in these languages useless.
>
> Another premiere example is the Java-API-interface to the entire OOo.
> Removing Java removes the ability to use OOo from Java and to deploy all
> Java applications that use OOo.
>
> Therefore the conclusion, that removing Java from OOo yields OOo to be
> badly crippled.
>

So people who need these features won't use LO. Where is the problem?

-- 
Regards,
Konstantin