Re: Re: [l10n-dev] Dictionaries in OOo 3.3

Hello Thomas,

On Tuesday 01 February 2011, 04:37, Thomas Lange wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 01.02.2011 00:00, Alexandro Colorado wrote:
> > There has been some issues installing custom dictionaries, they are
> > installing correctly but there is no way to find them on the dictionaries
> > options. Can I get verification on this bug.
> > 
> > 1. Download a dictionary .oxt
> > 2. Install through unopkg or Extension manager
> > 3. Install succesfully
> > 4. Go to Options -> Language Aids -> General
> > 5. Select the dictionary --- the dictionary doesn't show with the
> > checkmark.
> > 
> > Please let me know if I should forward this if this is not the right
> > list. I was tempted to go to lingucomponents but there doesnt seem to be
> > much traffic there.
> > 
> > Regards.
> > 
> > here is some of my research:
> > 
> > The extension gets installed under these paths:
> > ~/.
> > openoffice.org/3/user/extensions/tmp/extensions/bJTezF_/es_MX.oxt/es_MX.a
> > ff dictionaries.xcu has the following path:
> > *%origin%es_MX.aff*
> > on the stock dictionaries which are systemwide:
> > /opt/openoffice.org3/share/extensions/dict-es/es_ES.aff
> 
> So far I am not aware of any such issue in OOo or Oracle OpenOffice.
> The only place where I have seen such issues repeatedly is on the LO
> mailing list. Thus it may be a LO problem only.

I have no idea what that LO-thing is, but I can reproduce this in OOO330_m20.

The problem is with the XCU file.
The value of the "Locations" property is written in two lines:

            <prop oor:name="Locations" oor:type="oor:string-list">
                <value>%origin%/es_AR.aff
                       %origin%/es_AR.dic
                </value>
            </prop>

if you change this and write the value in a single line:

            <prop oor:name="Locations" oor:type="oor:string-list">
                <value>%origin%/es_ES.aff %origin%/es_ES.dic</value>
            </prop>

the dictionary works.

It looks like something changed in the config. code, sure Stephan can tell if 
this is a new feature or a bug.

Regards
-- 
Ariel Constenla-Haile
La Plata, Argentina

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (GNU/Linux)
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=nxE5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----