Re: Result: Logo for the 10th anniversary - request for approval
Martin Hollmichel <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.openoffice.devel.marketing |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Drew, Am 04.10.2010 20:19, schrieb Drew Jensen: > On 10/04/2010 01:54 PM, Ian wrote: >> On Mon, 2010-10-04 at 19:45 +0200, Martin Hollmichel wrote: >> >>> An important point indeed is that both side keep the constructive >>> dialog >>> open and trying to find compromises between their different objectives. >> What are the different objectives of the two projects in your view >> Martin? > > Yes Please - I would be most interested in what you perceive the > different objectives to be. maybe you should read the announcement and faq of the Document Foundation, there I would expect the objectives of that project explained. If you don't understand those, ask them but not me, > > If I may add one more thing - this from one of the primary marketing > pieces on the OO.o site: > > ------------------- > It's hard to believe that high quality, > easy to use software like OpenOffice.org 3 can really be free. > > But thanks to contributions of time and money, from individuals and > companies (large and small), OpenOffice.org is free for you to use today. > > Furthermore, the open-source licence used by OpenOffice.org 3 means > this freedom can never be taken away. > > The OpenOffice.org community are delighted if you find our software of > use. > ------------------------- > > During my time here Sun, then Oracle, was continually referred to as > the primary sponsor of the community, not the community itself. > > If Oracle no longer feels that it's objectives are in alignment with > those of the community at large, and therefore no longer willing to > sponsor the OpenOffice.org Community, then I believe it best to make > that statement publicly, clearly and without obfuscation. > The representatives of that other Project got an answer to their letter to Oracle, I honestly don't know if they made this public or not but I assume so. > Naturally the corporation is free to retain the registered domain name > and trademark which are it's property. Although as one community > member I would ask again for Oracle Corp to make those assets > available to the OpenOffice.org Community. > > Please understand that I again speak only for myself. > > Looking forward to your reply. > > Sincerely, > > Drew Jensen > Martin