Re: Result: Logo for the 10th anniversary - request for approval

Martin Hollmichel <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.openoffice.devel.marketing
Message-ID <[email protected]>
  Drew,

Am 04.10.2010 20:19, schrieb Drew Jensen:
>  On 10/04/2010 01:54 PM, Ian wrote:
>> On Mon, 2010-10-04 at 19:45 +0200, Martin Hollmichel wrote:
>>
>>> An important point indeed is that both side keep the constructive 
>>> dialog
>>> open and trying to find compromises between their different objectives.
>> What are the different objectives of the two projects in your view
>> Martin?
>
> Yes Please - I would be most interested in what you perceive the 
> different objectives to be.
maybe you should read the announcement and faq of the Document 
Foundation, there I would expect the objectives of that project 
explained. If you don't understand those, ask them but not me,
>
> If I may add one more thing - this from one of the primary marketing 
> pieces on the OO.o site:
>
> -------------------
> It's hard to believe that high quality,
> easy to use software like OpenOffice.org 3 can really be free.
>
> But thanks to contributions of time and money, from individuals and 
> companies (large and small), OpenOffice.org is free for you to use today.
>
> Furthermore, the open-source licence used by OpenOffice.org 3 means 
> this freedom can never be taken away.
>
> The OpenOffice.org community are delighted if you find our software of 
> use.
> -------------------------
>
> During my time here Sun, then Oracle, was continually referred to as 
> the primary sponsor of the community, not the community itself.
>
> If Oracle no longer feels that it's objectives are in alignment with 
> those of the community at large, and therefore no longer willing to 
> sponsor the OpenOffice.org Community, then I believe it best to make 
> that statement publicly, clearly and without obfuscation.
>
The representatives of that other Project got an answer to their letter 
to Oracle, I honestly don't know if they made this public or not but I 
assume so.
> Naturally the corporation is free to retain the registered domain name 
> and trademark which are it's property. Although as one community 
> member I would ask again for Oracle Corp to make those assets 
> available to the OpenOffice.org Community.
>
> Please understand that I again speak only for myself.
>
> Looking forward to your reply.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Drew Jensen
>
Martin
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.