Re: Result: Logo for the 10th anniversary - request for approval

Thorsten Behrens <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.openoffice.devel.marketing
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Björn Michaelsen wrote:
> > Your definition of "this project" is kinda arbitrary, and definitely
> > does not match mine. For me, this project is defined by its
> > community, the shared vision on what it is & what it should become -
> And the focal point of this is the source code and the final product
> (aka OpenOffice.org releases).
> 
My point exactly - if the source code is on Oracle property, it's
OpenOffice.org in your mind - if not, it's a fork you say. 

> > and if you look around, you find very many people, including all
> > non-Oracle members of the CC, favouring an independent foundation.
> A foundation per se is a great thing, but when there are two source
> code repositories and two final products then "this project" is either
> schizophrenic or it is actually two projects. And being schizophrenic
> is not a healthy state of mind.
> 
Then OOo 3.2.1, 3.2 etc. are forks, too? And surely, in this day and
age, we have at least as many source code repositories as there are
active developers in the project - as with DSCMs, everyone has his
local clone anyway. I find the attempt to argue on the grounds of
technicalities rather ironic, when, in reality, all this is about is
community.

> If do want not contribute to that under the current conditions 
> there are only two mutually exclusive choices: Either try to 
> change the conditions in the existing project or start your own.
>
Quite. Currently we're trying to change the conditions with, and
within, the existing project. You argue we are not entitled to do
so, and I wonder where that authority comes from.

> I guess, mixing both throwing in an "independant foundation that
> is part of it"(*) will not serve anybody.
>
The term independence is referring to vendor/company independence -
and I think you're very well aware of that. ;)

Cheers,

-- Thorsten
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 198 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.15 (GNU/Linux)

iEUEARECAAYFAkyrDQ8ACgkQ0atnB9QI2h/u6ACguiTmlc3QZLrMXbkOd2wJ/YUS
wNUAmLQ8iq1w7/1mB59t6VypY4rM52k=
=QtMJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.