[marketing-dev] Re: Why TDF should be the place for one united Community

Davide Dozza <[email protected]> Wed, 25 May 2011 17:50:51 +0200
Newsgroups gmane.comp.openoffice.devel.marketing
Message-ID <[email protected]>
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
--------------enig8DD725A242E52A68646902F0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Il 25/05/2011 16:55, Louis Suarez-Potts ha scritto:
> There are many good reasons to have any discussion as proposed by the T=
DF=97Florian and Sophie=97on a neutral ground. I've mentioned the compell=
ing ones.=20
>=20
> And I also think we need to proceed very carefully here. Not only for "=
community" reasons but also because a lot is at stake beyond our narrow c=
oncerns.
>=20

Time is come. As still member of OOo community I *strongly* believe that
such discussion should be made in public.
Otherwise we (the community) still fall into our "narrow concers" as it
was during last ten years.

Community deserves at least a minimum of clarity on OOo future.
TDF is a possible place to reunify the community and there is nothing
else on the horizon.

Davide




--------------enig8DD725A242E52A68646902F0
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAk3dJVsACgkQIXgZqRs8KhOVPQCdGB2/2pYmOzonag2lC8mKEyY7
LjUAoJVLRi0mQNyq+N5Up88JuEg6S06v
=JkPU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--------------enig8DD725A242E52A68646902F0--