Re: Build break MacOS X - SRC680_m95
Sergio Trejo <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.openoffice.devel.porting |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 5/1/05, Eric Hoch <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Sergio, > Am Sun, 1 May 2005 06:17:13 -1000, schrieb Sergio Trejo: > > Wow, this is one very interesting rapidly developing arena. My > > environment is 10.3.8 and with Darwin Ports. Can someone recommend the > > most highly probably successful build of 1.9 to try? Should I go for > > m96? m97? m98 with NAKATA's patches? The circular dependency > > possibility, and the confusion on mozilla is also a bit crazy. Thanks > > for anyone's suggestion for highest probability of success! > > I would try to build m95 or m96. If you are not that familiar with > the Mac OS X build process you will fail in later milestones more > certain then with the quite stable m95 or m96. Simply grab the > patch packages from Maho for correpsonding build and try your best. > Simply cut off the milestone specific directory in mahos submitted > urls or search for his post for m95 or m96 patches. Hi Eric H., Just wanted to let you and others know that Mr. NAKATA Maho's patches via FTP do not include m95, so I am going to try out m96 in a few moments. I wonder, are Maho's patches to be used in addition to all of the other patches (including from your iDisk for 680 m90)? Therefore, to build 680 m96 the patches to apply are: Maho's + Eric H's from his iDisk 680m90 + Florian Heckl's Mozilla patches? Or just: Maho's + Florian Heckl's Mozilla patches? Thanks for clarification. Serg