Re: Build break MacOS X - SRC680_m95

Sergio Trejo <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.openoffice.devel.porting
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hello Eric,

On 5/2/05, Eric Hoch <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Sergio,
> Am Mon, 2 May 2005 22:40:40 -1000, schrieb Sergio Trejo:
> > On 5/1/05, Eric Hoch <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>  Hi Sergio,
> >>  Am Sun, 1 May 2005 06:17:13 -1000, schrieb Sergio Trejo:
> > Hi Eric H.,
> >
> > Just wanted to let you and others know that Mr. NAKATA Maho's patches
> > via FTP do not include m95, so I am going to try out m96 in a few
> > moments.
> 
> O.K.
> 
> > I wonder, are Maho's patches to be used in addition to all of
> > the other patches (including from your iDisk for 680 m90)?
> >
> > Therefore, to build 680 m96 the patches to apply are:
> >
> > Maho's  + Eric H's from his iDisk 680m90 + Florian Heckl's Mozilla patches?
> 
> This is necesary if you build with Darwinports gtk2 and don't want
> to compile Mozilla yourself.
> > Or just:
> >
> > Maho's + Florian Heckl's Mozilla patches?
> 
> This is necessary if you have gtk2 via fink or build it yourself
> and don't want to compile Mozilla yourself.

Actually, I have both gtk2 and Mozilla 1.7.6 already installed and
working fine via DarwinPorts. However, I do not mind compiling Mozilla
again for the benefit of OOo 1.9 m96 if that is what it takes. Per
your other message, I indeed would like SSL capability that the
Mozilla compile gives us.

> I guess I will split up my patch package into one package for the
> Darwinport freetype problem and one for using pre-compiled Mozilla
> libs.
> Any ideas how to make things clearer in my build instructions. I
> hoped it not to be that confusing but it looks like it is.

I think your build instructions are fine. I was just a little bit
unsure about how Maho's packages are to be integrated becuase his
packages are only for m96+ and since your build instructions are for
m90, I wasn't sure if your iDisk patches applied toward > m90 such as
and including m95, m96, etc.

For example, from your m90 patches, we have:

build/freetype2_test/freetype-2.1.9.patch

Yet, in the m96 build directory, I can not find:

--- misc/build/freetype-2.1.9/builds/unix/freetype-config.in

But there is this folder:

build/freetype/freetype-2.1.4.patch

and

build/freetype/download/freetype-2.1.4.tar.gz

Thus, I presume that m96 can not use the freetype-2.1.9.patch from
your iDisk for m90 since there is a version mismatch (2.14 v.s. 2.19)?

Thank you for clarifying even more so.

Cheers,

Sergio

> 
> Regards,
> Eric Hoch
> 
> --
> ## Ansprechpartner Anwenderunterstützung, users-Mailingliste, MacOSX
> ## de.OpenOffice.org - Office für MacOS X, Linux, Solaris & Windows
> ## Openoffice.org - ich steck mit drin!
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.