Re: Build break MacOS X - SRC680_m95
Sergio Trejo <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.openoffice.devel.porting |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hello Eric, On 5/2/05, Eric Hoch <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Sergio, > Am Mon, 2 May 2005 22:40:40 -1000, schrieb Sergio Trejo: > > On 5/1/05, Eric Hoch <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi Sergio, > >> Am Sun, 1 May 2005 06:17:13 -1000, schrieb Sergio Trejo: > > Hi Eric H., > > > > Just wanted to let you and others know that Mr. NAKATA Maho's patches > > via FTP do not include m95, so I am going to try out m96 in a few > > moments. > > O.K. > > > I wonder, are Maho's patches to be used in addition to all of > > the other patches (including from your iDisk for 680 m90)? > > > > Therefore, to build 680 m96 the patches to apply are: > > > > Maho's + Eric H's from his iDisk 680m90 + Florian Heckl's Mozilla patches? > > This is necesary if you build with Darwinports gtk2 and don't want > to compile Mozilla yourself. > > Or just: > > > > Maho's + Florian Heckl's Mozilla patches? > > This is necessary if you have gtk2 via fink or build it yourself > and don't want to compile Mozilla yourself. Actually, I have both gtk2 and Mozilla 1.7.6 already installed and working fine via DarwinPorts. However, I do not mind compiling Mozilla again for the benefit of OOo 1.9 m96 if that is what it takes. Per your other message, I indeed would like SSL capability that the Mozilla compile gives us. > I guess I will split up my patch package into one package for the > Darwinport freetype problem and one for using pre-compiled Mozilla > libs. > Any ideas how to make things clearer in my build instructions. I > hoped it not to be that confusing but it looks like it is. I think your build instructions are fine. I was just a little bit unsure about how Maho's packages are to be integrated becuase his packages are only for m96+ and since your build instructions are for m90, I wasn't sure if your iDisk patches applied toward > m90 such as and including m95, m96, etc. For example, from your m90 patches, we have: build/freetype2_test/freetype-2.1.9.patch Yet, in the m96 build directory, I can not find: --- misc/build/freetype-2.1.9/builds/unix/freetype-config.in But there is this folder: build/freetype/freetype-2.1.4.patch and build/freetype/download/freetype-2.1.4.tar.gz Thus, I presume that m96 can not use the freetype-2.1.9.patch from your iDisk for m90 since there is a version mismatch (2.14 v.s. 2.19)? Thank you for clarifying even more so. Cheers, Sergio > > Regards, > Eric Hoch > > -- > ## Ansprechpartner Anwenderunterstützung, users-Mailingliste, MacOSX > ## de.OpenOffice.org - Office für MacOS X, Linux, Solaris & Windows > ## Openoffice.org - ich steck mit drin! >