Re: what tag for latest 1.1.X build for MacOSX
"Kevin B. Hendricks" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.openoffice.devel.porting |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Eric B. > Maybe you can have a look at : > <http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=48737> (stlport > for 1.1.4) > > Florian has made a great work for this issue. > > + (to be adapted ) > > <http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=48520> > <http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=48522> > > 1) Theses patches probably need to be modified, since they break > the build on 10.3 > 2) I have not entered all corresponding issues for 1.1.x, sorry Thanks. I will include those. >> So before trying to help out on the Mac OSX build for pre-2.0, I >> would like to successfully build the latest OOo 1.1.X that has >> fixes for building with gcc-4.0.X in it. >> > > What is so important to build with gcc-4.0 ? Reading some benchmark > let me think that it's not yet fully usable... But MacOSX Tiger default compiler on my machine seems to be gcc-4.0 [KBH-Computer:~] kbhend% gcc -dumpversion 4.0.0 It is Not gcc-3.3. I installed the XCode 2 tools that came with the Tiger install dvd. Is there an environment variable or a program to run that can reset this to gcc-3.3 as default? I guess I could simply change all of the symlinks that Tiger set up for me ... [KBH-Computer:~] kbhend% cd /usr/bin [KBH-Computer:/usr/bin] kbhend% ls -l *cc* lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 7 May 9 12:24 cc -> gcc-4.0 -rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 69280 Mar 20 19:13 distcc -rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 92260 Mar 20 19:13 distccd -rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 100904 Mar 20 19:13 distccschedd lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 7 May 9 12:24 gcc -> gcc-4.0 And the ones for g++ as well and cpp and ... Has anyone successfully built under Tiger with XCode 2 tools installed? If so, which tree and which compiler version are they using? > I'm actually building 1.9.102 with gcc-3.3 and IBMj2sdk 1.4.2, but > only with 32bits arch (PPC G4). > BTW : Have you some news from Blackdown jdk ? Nothing positive I am afraid. I personally switched to the IBM JDK 1.4.X builds since Blackdown JDK 1.3.1 was getting so long in the tooth. > > If you are interested, you can try en-US version (m99), you'll find > here : <http://ooo.lab-project.net/~ebachard/Linux_PowerPC/2.0/m99/ > deb/en-US/> > > Be carefull : this build needs the IBM 1.4.2jre, else it wont work > as expected. Great! I will install the newer 1.4.2 (my old version was JDK 1.4.1) from IBM and give your build a try under PPC Linux. Nice work! Kevin