Re: gcc_select 3.3?

Hi Maho, 
Am Wed, 08 Jun 2005 09:40:57 +0900 (JST), schrieb NAKATA Maho:
> In Message-ID: <[email protected]> 
> Florian Heckl <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>>  Hello all,
>>  
>>  On 06.06.2005, at 23:24, eric.bachard wrote:
>>  
>>  
>>>  If you want you can begin to fix everything needed for build OOo  
>>>  with gcc4.0, open all necessary issue for this, and when we are  
>>>  sure, we change for gcc4.0 ?
> both.
> 
>>  Sounds good to me. I might have another go next week or later this  
>>  week with the new gcc 4 that Apple ships with Xcode 2.1.
> 
> ericb: there are two issues
> o hardcoding to g++ is apparently wrong.
> o smooth change to gcc-4.0 if we don't use gcc-4.0 atm, still
> forcing user to execute gcc_select is also apparently wrong.

You are right but I guess we will not have the time to move to gcc 
4.0 and release 2.0 in a sustainable time frame that is not that 
much behind the major plattforms Solaris, Windows and Linux. 

I'm not a coder and I may be totally wrong but what I heard from 
Florian so far let me come to this conclusion. 

So we have to decided wether we want a gcc 4.0 2.0 OOo for Mac OS X 
which may delay release for some more weeks or if we want a gcc 3.3 
2.0 OpenOffice.org which forces users to execute gcc_select. 

I can make a big note for Tiger users wanting to compile OOo that 
they need to do a sudo gcc_select before starting the build process 
of OOo 680. 

Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Eric Hoch

-- 
## Ansprechpartner Anwenderunterstützung, users-Mailingliste, MacOSX
## de.OpenOffice.org - Office für MacOS X, Linux, Solaris & Windows
## Openoffice.org - ich steck mit drin!