Re: M109 on MacOSX 10.4
Tino Rachui - Sun Germany - Development - Software Engineer <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.openoffice.devel.porting |
|---|---|
| Organization | StarOffice / Sun Microsystems, Inc. |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
James, James McKenzie wrote: >> Today, I removed pkgsrc and swich back to fink again. >> >> Build dependencies for me is: >> fink install gtk+2 >> >> > Looks like I am getting a corrupt file when I try this: > > docbkx412.zip. > > I tried downloading it from the Oasis web/ftp site and it is corrupt > there. Sent the webmaster a message advising of this. Did you need > DocBook support to complete the installation of the gtk+2 package? > > BTW, it looks like I will have more free time this week than I > originally planned on, but I will be very busy and only have time to > troubleshoot a few problems. > > Also, I would like to ask other folks on the list what they are using to > get gtk+2 support running? your problems sound a little bit familiar to me. When I started building OOo on my Mac a few weeks ago I stepped into the same problems with fink and gtk+. 1. During installation of gtk+2 a got a corrupt file message too though I do not remember if it was the same file (docbkx412.zip). Ignoring this file had no further negative impact. 2. Though I installed gtk+2 and other available gtk+? packages I was not able to build mozilla until I realized that what fink did install were only the gtk+? sources. I still had to do a 'make' and 'make install' in order to really install these packages on my Mac. Before doing this pkgconfig did not show any of the gtk+? packages in the list of available packages. I'm not sure if I did something wrong but this was the way for me to get gtk+? installed properly and be able to build mozilla. Does pkgconfig show you gtk+? in the list of available packages? HTH, Tino