Re: Mac OS X 10.4 + 1.9m109 ja version (Re: [porting-dev] M109 on MacOSX 10.4)
James McKenzie <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.openoffice.devel.porting |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
James McKenzie wrote: > Eric Hoch wrote: > >> Hi James, Am Fri, 17 Jun 2005 14:43:00 -0700, schrieb James McKenzie: >> >> >>> I'm getting errors building vcl when checkdll.sh checks the dylib >>> file. I submitted an IZ on the error. I'm suspecting that libjpeg >>> is not building correctly, or I'm using the wrong configure line for >>> it. >>> >> >> >> Sorry so far still no idea where your bug is laying. Something must >> be messed up there. I really don't understand that you have so much >> problems. >> >> > I just tried to do the following: > > checkdll <dylib> > > and the result was 'ok'. > > Looks like the problem might be checkdll.sh or the version of checkdll > built by OOo. I'm going to investigate a little further. > I just figured out what is happening by running checkdll.sh with the following: checkdll.sh libvcl680mxp.dylib and the result was: Checking DLL libvcl680mxp.dylib ...: ok and if I run the following: checkdll.sh -L /usr/lib libvcl680mxp.dylib I get the error. It looks like the script is walking through the /usr/lib directory and checking all of the dylib files in the directory. So I decided to do the following: checkdll.sh libjpeg.62.0.0.dylib (libjpeg.62.dylib is symlinked to this file) and I got the following: Checking DLL libjpeg.62.0.0.dylib ...: WARNING: dlsym(0x1009e0, GetVersionInfo): symbol not found So the problem is that the checkdll.sh is checking dll's/dylib's other than the target and this appears to be improper operation. And I think the libjpeg.dylib file is not properly built. Is someone willing to put the files for libjpeg up so that I can download them? James McKenzie