Re: Integrating cws_macjoin1153

[email protected] wrote:

>
>>> Much more interesting is the integration of the fixes into 2.0 
>>> sources. Here we have to take a look and see if Patricks patches, 
>>> ported to 2.0, are of any help for 2.0 and prevent double work. Here 
>>> we should take a closer look. But this isn't easy and here any help 
>>> is welcomed. Here you could do code comparison.
>>
>> I agree.  We should be focusing on the current build and not a 
>> backport release that may or may not happen.
>
>
> I'd like to remind the happy porting crowd that there is no 1.1.4 for 
> OSX/X11 on the official download page.
>
> Most of the places I know that propose OSX/X11 work with 1.1.2.
>
> I understand that 2.0 _is_ the next step from porting perspective, but 
> from the user side, we'd rather have OOo go one step at a time :)
>
> Unless there are technical reasons _not_ to propose a 1.1.4 for 
> OSX/X11, in which case that should be documented on the download page, 
> I suggest that some time is taken to make a 1.1.4 working build for 
> OSX/X11.
>
That is one of the things that I am working on.  I can build OOo 1.9 
m110 and am downloading OOo 1.9 M112 to build with Maho's scripts and 
patches, which I retrieved from good-day.net.

My attempts to build 1.1.4 end with idlc erroring out when I try to 
build udkapi.

James McKenzie