Re: mingw port

Hi!

Takashi Ono wrote:
> Hi, fellas, long time no see.
> I am working on minw port for src680 codeline now.
Great!

> I strongly feel that mingw tool are not so sophisticated to build a big project like
> OOo. As the scale of OOo project get larger, I am facing so many bugs in mingw tools.
> Very fortunately, I seem to have found out all the causes of the bugs and created
> patches for mingw tools to remedy the problems.
> I also had to add more patches for new win32 api's.
>
> However, with all my tough works, there is no significant progress for the time
> being. I still cannot build OLE part of OOo. In addition, cli_ure project cannot be
> build with mingw. Other parts of OOo seem to be working well.
>
> ->vq
> As I am now using newer versions of mingw tools, the patches are pretty well
> different from those for srx645 codeline. Should I post the patches for OOo source as
> well as all patches for mingw tools at issue#24588# or open a new issue? Your
> suggestion is highly appreciated.
As Ause already said, please open a new issue and file them there.

Thanks for doing this, I will setup a mingw build environment
and help testing.

It would be really cool if we could get OOo build with gcc on windows :)

Volker

--
If you like my work consider:  http://www.scytek.de/donations.html
PGP/GPG key  (ID: 0x9F8A785D)  available  from  wwwkeys.de.pgp.net
key-fingerprint 550D F17E B082 A3E9 F913  9E53 3D35 C9BA 9F8A 785D

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (MinGW)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFDA1gnPTXJup+KeF0RAo9yAKCZoQFCiugZYaQCqCmmzniUqWxBhACfaYuO
fUrEbxMKeApGbRpwTuYu40M=
=L9qT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----