Re: mingw port

In Message-ID: <[email protected]> 
Takashi Ono <[email protected]> wrote:

Ono sama!
> I quite agree with you but I have no good idea how to split the patches.
okay.

> One idea is to split them by projects but as most of makefiles are affected, it may 
> become piles of too many fragments.
> 
> Maybe it makes sense to split them into global parts (config_office, solenv, scp?), 
> project with only obvious modifications (makefile modification to cope with library 
> naming convention and source modification to cope with language incompatibility of 
> the compiler only), and some parts including only one project which requires 
> essential modification.

Right. Issue must have a clear explanation. if something went wrong
it is very hard for us to track.
 
one idea from me is original issue set to be a task and write
the direction of your work. how you patch set_soenv, config_office etc.
just abstract things. then break things into several parts.
this part should be more specific.
-- NAKATA, Maho ([email protected])