Re: What is (or should be) the Mac OS X baseline for OOo 2.0?
"eric.bachard" <[email protected]> Fri, 16 Sep 2005 14:15:08 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.openoffice.devel.porting |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Tino, Tino Rachui - Sun Germany - Development - Software Engineer a écrit : > Thanks for the link. At least a good hint - Jaguar 1%! IMHO, it's maybe more important.. I'd prefer say 5% , more close to the reality, and probably less than 10% of Jaguar users is sure. > Does Apple have own data and statistics? I don't know, but it would be great to have official statistics. Asking on Mac OS X (fr ) forum, an user gave me this link : <http://daringfireball.net/2005/06/tiger_adoption_rate> This is not the same analyse (only safari is concerned), but it is informative too. We can see that Jaguar (Mac OS X 10.2) is less important in use, far behind 10.3 and 10.4. It's not possible to conclude between Panther and Tiger, but it doesn't matter : we provide build compatible for both :-) Kind regards, eric bachard -- <[email protected]> Francophone OpenOffice.org Community developer ( Linux PPC and Mac OS X / X11) See : <http://fr.openoffice.org>