Re: Re: [udk-cvs] CVS update: /udk/ure/source/uretest/

Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 22. November 2006 14:55 schrieb Stephan Bergmann:
>> Is this change really clean?  While it is important that standard 
> 
> It is, afaik.
> 
>> headers are
>>
>>    #include <map>
>>
>> etc. the situation is different for non-standard headers like STLport's 
>> hash_map.  (We repeatedly had the discussion whether headers delivered 
>> by one part of OOo and used within another part of OOo should be 
>> included <...> or "...".  We do not need to repeat that discussion here, 
>> as we obviously come to no agreement, and it might be considered a 
>> matter of style which to choose.)
> 
> There's three possibilities:
> 
> a) use OOos internal stlport. In this case the -I to the internal one gets
>    added and iirc that takes precedence
> 
> b) external stlport. You specify the stlport home and the include also gets
>    set
> 
> c) build with gccs stl (never tried that but it's supported by configure) in
>    which case this shouldn't be a problem either.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Rene

I did not mean clean as "happens to work with the current 
constellations," but rather clean as "as conforming as possible to any 
relevant standards, to avoid potential future problems."

-Stephan